![dolphin penis dolphin penis](https://i0.wp.com/i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--rCR1psDF--/c_fit,fl_progressive,q_80,w_636/1382595447061382575.jpg)
![dolphin penis dolphin penis](https://fscomps.fotosearch.com/compc/UNS/UNS023/bottlenose-dolphin-tursiops-truncatus-stock-image__u12169320.jpg)
DOLPHIN PENIS FREE
I had reservations about the wisdom of doing so, but Doug Cartlidge told me Bloom would hate the opportunity I had to espouse about dolphins being free and not in captivity. Contrast them to the Daily Star and the Manchester Evening News, which both remarked on what a complete farce it all had been.Ī week or so after the case, I appeared on the Jonathan Ross show on ITV. I was really pleased that this trash paper was forced to close down in 2011 as a result of them illegally tapping people's phones. They even tried to renege on the payment and it took a solicitor's letter and several weeks to get a cheque. Instead they fabricated a story of innuendo. In naivety, I had expected a story about wrongly accused man, his year of hell, and then his acquittal. He needn't have bothered, for when the article appeared the following day what appeared was a completely made-up story and a horrible photograph. If I or someone around me had given it clearer thought I wouldn't have made it, with such a disreputable 'newspaper'.Īn agent for the News of the World met me on Saturday at Amble to photograph a celebratory swim with Freddy and the conduct the necessary interview for the story. The News of the World offered the most, £5000, which I intended to donate to the campaign, so a deal was done. My head was spinning, not only from the week in court, but the year leading up to it. I now believe that was precisely the reason that they did initiate the court case, hoping to get me found guilty and therefore discredit the movement I had been part of for ten years.įollowing the verdict, there was some interest from the press on gaining an exclusive. I had naively thought they wouldn't initiate an expensive court case, that my background as an animal rights activist would pre-empt that. As Tony Jennings proved, it wasn't hard to break that veneer of the witnesses being independent. Why did the Crown Prosecution Service proceed with this case? They may say that they had, on the face of it, statements from several individuals to prove that a 'crime' had been committed. Another consideration was that the burden of proof to win the case would be with me and to prove that Bloom had acted disingenuously would have been difficult in my opinion to do. I considered the possibility of taking out a private civil court action against Bloom for malicious defamation, however legal aid to pursue the matter was only available if I could show that I had suffered economic business loss. If he had succeeded in discrediting me, if I, someone fighting his slave-trade, had been found guilty, what could be better for him?
![dolphin penis dolphin penis](https://media1.tenor.com/images/f12ffc784077131c4cf60f90b46680b7/tenor.gif)
![dolphin penis dolphin penis](https://www.lojapimenta.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/product_9_4_9432-4.jpg)
I believe Bloom had his own agenda, to prove that a dolphin displaying his penis when swimming with humans is sexually aroused and that should be discouraged. The journalists probably wouldn't have needed much influencing for as Jennings put it, they had the scoop of the century, if it could be proven. Also, humans, unlike dolphins, do not use their penises for domestic purposes, such as pushing the supermarket trolley! Chapter 9: Penis Exposure by Dolphinsīloom, a self-professed "expert", must surely have influenced others on the boat. Human beings - apart from at rugby club dinners, did not use their penises to greet each other. A classic crown court comment from a great barrister:Īnthony Jennings QC told the jury they should not apply human concepts of sexual behaviour to dolphins.